Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

California Retail Liquor Dealers Association v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.

United States Supreme Court
445 U.S. 97 (1980)


Facts

Under § 24866(b) of the California Business and Professions Code, all wine producers and wholesalers are obligated to file fair-trade contracts or price schedules with the State of California. Private wine dealers set the price schedules used to determine minimum pricing. If a wine producer or wholesaler sells wine below the prices established by the price schedules, the producer or wholesaler will be subject to fines and license suspension or revocation. Midcal Aluminum, Inc. (Midcal) (plaintiff) was a wholesale distributer of wine in California. In 1978, Midcal sold 27 cases of wine at prices below the prices established in the pricing schedule and was charged for violating § 24866(b). Midcal did not contest the allegations and instead filed a writ of mandate in the California court system, seeking an injunction against California’s wine-pricing policy. Midcal alleged that the pricing system was an antitrust violation under the Sherman Act. The court of appeal ruled in favor of Midcal, and the California Retail Liquor Dealers Association challenged the decision, arguing that the wine-pricing policy was immune to antitrust violations under the state-action doctrine.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Powell, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.