California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians
United States Supreme Court
480 U.S. 202, 107 S.Ct. 1083, 94 L.Ed.2d 244 (1987)
- Written by Lauren Groth, JD
Facts
The Cabazon Band of Mission Indians (Cabazon) (defendant) operated bingo, poker, and other casino card games on the reservation in California. Gaming was open to the public and was enjoyed primarily by non-Indians who visited the reservation to play. The State of California (plaintiff) and Riverside County, California, attempted to impose state regulations on the gaming operations conducted on the reservation. The Cabazon sued Riverside County in federal court, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against imposition of the regulations. California intervened, arguing that under Public Law 280, 28 U.S.C. § 1360, Congress granted states the power to regulate gaming on the Indian reservation. The district court granted summary judgment to the Cabazon, holding that neither California nor Riverside County had authority to enforce gaming laws within the reservation. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (White, J.)
Dissent (Stevens, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.