California v. Carney
United States Supreme Court
471 U.S. 386, 105 S.Ct. 2066, 85 L.Ed.2d 406 (1985)
- Written by Sarah Venti, JD
Facts
Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) agents received a tip that Carney (defendant) was selling marijuana out of his mobile home. The mobile home was relatively large, it was parked in a public lot just a few blocks from the court house, and the windows, including the front windshield, were covered by shades or curtains. The DEA kept Carney under surveillance and watched as he entered the mobile home with another man. When the other man exited the mobile home, the police questioned him and he told them that Carney had given him marijuana in exchange for sex. The police then had the man knock on Carney’s door and when Carney answered the police entered the home and found evidence of drugs. Over Carney’s objections, the trial judge allowed the admission of the evidence found in Carney’s mobile home and the superior court also rejected Carney’s claim when he renewed his motion to suppress. Carney pleaded nolo contendere and the Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Burger, C.J.)
Dissent (Stevens, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 782,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.