California v. Carney

471 U.S. 386, 105 S.Ct. 2066, 85 L.Ed.2d 406 (1985)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

California v. Carney

United States Supreme Court
471 U.S. 386, 105 S.Ct. 2066, 85 L.Ed.2d 406 (1985)

Play video

Facts

Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) agents received a tip that Carney (defendant) was selling marijuana out of his mobile home. The mobile home was relatively large, it was parked in a public lot just a few blocks from the court house, and the windows, including the front windshield, were covered by shades or curtains. The DEA kept Carney under surveillance and watched as he entered the mobile home with another man. When the other man exited the mobile home, the police questioned him and he told them that Carney had given him marijuana in exchange for sex. The police then had the man knock on Carney’s door and when Carney answered the police entered the home and found evidence of drugs. Over Carney’s objections, the trial judge allowed the admission of the evidence found in Carney’s mobile home and the superior court also rejected Carney’s claim when he renewed his motion to suppress. Carney pleaded nolo contendere and the Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Burger, C.J.)

Dissent (Stevens, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 782,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 782,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 782,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership