California v. Ciraolo
United States Supreme Court
476 U.S. 207 (1986)
- Written by DeAnna Swearingen, LLM
Facts
Santa Clara Police Officers went to Ciraolo’s (defendant) home to investigate an anonymous tip that marijuana was being grown in the backyard. The yard was shielded from view by a six-foot perimeter fence and a ten-foot interior fence. The officers then flew over the house in a private plane and observed marijuana growing in the yard. The officers took photos with a standard 35 mm camera from a distance of 1,000 feet. Using the anonymous tip and the photos, police were able to secure a search warrant on September 8, 1982. The following day police seized 73 marijuana plants from Ciraolo’s property. The California Court of Appeals reversed. The U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari to address whether the Fourth Amendment prohibits the warrantless aerial observation of an enclosed area within the curtilage of a home from a distance of 1,000 feet.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Burger, C.J.)
Dissent (Powell, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 789,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
