California v. Ramos
United States Supreme Court
463 U.S. 992, 103 S. Ct. 3446, 77 L. Ed. 2d 1171 (1983)
- Written by Robert Cane, JD
Facts
Marcelino Ramos (defendant) shot two coworkers, killing one, during the course of a robbery. At trial, a jury found Ramos guilty of robbery, attempted murder, and first-degree murder. During the penalty phase of the trial, Ramos offered a great deal of mitigation evidence. The court instructed the jury on aggravating and mitigating circumstances and the fact that the governor of California may commute a life sentence without the possibility of parole to a sentence that includes the possibility of parole (the Briggs Instruction). Ramos was sentenced to death. The California Supreme Court affirmed Ramos’s conviction but reversed the death sentence. The California Supreme Court held that the Briggs Instruction was unconstitutional because it added a speculative element to the jury’s determination and it failed to inform the jury that the governor could commute a death sentence. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (O’Connor, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
