Calloway v. City of Reno
Nevada Supreme Court
993 P.2d 1259 (2000)
- Written by Samantha Arena, JD
Facts
Calloway and others (plaintiffs) brought a class-action suit against the City of Reno (defendant) and various contractors and subcontractors (defendants), claiming that their attached homes were built with defective materials and framing, causing water damage that resulted from rain and snow. Calloway contended that the contractors were liable for damages based upon various tort and contract theories, including negligence, strict liability, and breach of express and implied warranties. The contractors moved for summary judgment. The court granted the motion, concluding that Calloway could not recover based upon negligence or other tort theories for purely economic losses in the absence of proven personal injury or damage to other property. Calloway appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Young, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.