Calvert Cliffs Coordinating Committee v. U.S. Atomic Energy Commission
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
449 F.2d 1109 (1971)
The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) required federal agencies to prepare a “detailed statement” covering the impact of agency actions on the environment that would be considered at every important stage in the decision-making process. In response, the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (the Commission) (defendant) promulgated rules requiring an applicant seeking a permit to build and operate a nuclear power plant to prepare an “environmental report” assessing the likely impacts of the nuclear facility on the environment. Upon receipt of the report, the Commission would then draft its own “detailed statement” to accompany the applicant’s report. However, under the rules, neither document would be considered by the licensing board or received into evidence. Calvert Cliffs Coordinating Committee (Calvert) (plaintiff) filed a petition in the court of appeals against the Commission seeking review of the rules as arguing the Commission’s process was contrary to the text and intent of NEPA.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Wright, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.