Cambria Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Estate of Gross
Pennsylvania Superior Court
439 A.2d 1236 (1982)
- Written by Mary Pfotenhauer, JD
Facts
Gross signed a contract for the installation of siding. Gross planned to obtain disability insurance to cover the cost of the siding. The contract included a handwritten statement from the contractor that the contract would be null and void if Gross was unable to obtain disability insurance. The contractor completed the work despite knowing that Gross had not yet obtained insurance. Gross died, and his estate failed to pay for the siding. The contractor assigned its claim to Cambria Savings & Loan Association (Cambria) (plaintiff), which brought suit against Gross’s estate (the estate) (defendant). The trial court instructed the jury that the contract was a nullity, but that Cambria could recover on a quasi-contract action for unjust enrichment. The estate appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Montemuro, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.