Camden County Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Beretta, U.S.A. Corp.
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
273 F.3d 536 (2001)
- Written by Megan Petersen, JD
Facts
The Camden County Board of Chosen Freeholders (County) (plaintiff) brought suit against several handgun manufacturers, including Beretta, U.S.A. Corp. (Beretta) (defendant) based on negligence, negligent entrustment, and public nuisance theories. The County alleged that because of their marketing and distribution policies and practices, the manufacturers were liable for government costs arising from the criminal use of handguns in the County. Specifically, the County alleged that Beretta released into the market significantly more handguns than it expected to sell to lawful users; that it did not properly safeguard the channels in which guns were released or supervise their sale; that it did not penalize distributors for violating gun control laws; and that it received revenues from the criminal purchase of guns. The County did not allege any direct criminal acts performed by Beretta or any other gun manufacturer. The trial court dismissed the complaint, and the County appealed on the public nuisance theory only.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per Curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 777,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.