Campbell v. Board of Education of the Town of New Milford
Connecticut Supreme Court
475 A.2d 289 (1984)

- Written by Emily Laird, JD
Facts
John Campbell and other high school students (plaintiffs) sued their high school’s board of education (the school board) (defendant) in state court, claiming the high school’s academic sanctions for nonattendance violated their constitutional rights. The students’ high school had a rule that any student who had more than 24 unexcused absences would receive a five-point academic deduction for each day missed over 24 days. The policy encouraged regular attendance. The penalty was academic—not disciplinary—in nature. Students who were suspended from school were granted excused absences from class. The administration could waive the penalty based on prior outstanding performance or extenuating circumstances. The students claimed that the attendance-based academic penalty violated their constitutional rights to due process by deducting points from the students’ report cards and, as a result, injuring the students’ academic reputations. The students argued that the policy violated equal protection because it allowed the administration to treat students for whom it granted a penalty waiver differently from students for whom the administration did not grant the waiver. The school board argued that the poor-attendance penalty did not infringe on any fundamental constitutional rights and, as a result, was subject only to a rational-basis test. The state trial court found in favor of the school board. The students appealed to the state supreme court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Peters, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.