Campbell v. Indiana

284 N.E.2d 733 (1972)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Campbell v. Indiana

Indiana Supreme Court
284 N.E.2d 733 (1972)

Play video

Facts

Dewain Campbell (plaintiff) filed a negligence suit against the State of Indiana (the State) (defendant), after he sustained serious injuries in a head-on car accident. Campbell alleged that the State failed to mark a state-maintained highway with a yellow line designating where it was unsafe to pass another vehicle and failed to erect signs instructing travelers not to pass on certain parts of the highway. In a separate action, Harry Knotts, Jr. (plaintiff) filed a negligence suit against the City of Indianapolis and the State of Indiana (defendants) after he fell and injured himself on a crosswalk. Knotts claimed that the city and the State failed to maintain the crosswalk properly. In both cases, the trial courts dismissed the complaints on the basis of the doctrine of sovereign immunity. Campbell and Knotts appealed. In each case, the court of appeals affirmed the judgments of the trial courts. Campbell and Knotts petitioned the Supreme Court of Indiana for review. The cases were consolidated for review by the Supreme Court of Indiana.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Arterburn, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 805,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership