Canada Malting Co. v. Paterson Steamships, Ltd.
United States Supreme Court
285 U.S. 413 (1932)
- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
The Yorkton and the Mantadoc were vessels registered in Canada and owned by Canadian corporations. Both vessels were traveling in Lake Superior between Canadian ports when they collided with each other, after unintentionally crossing into United States waters at a point where the waterway narrowed. The Yorkton sank with a loss of cargo. A Canadian investigation found that both of the vessels had been at fault in the accident. Paterson Steamships, Ltd. (Paterson) (defendant), the owner of the Mantadoc, instituted a proceeding in Canadian court seeking a judicial determination of the liability issues. Three owners of cargo that had been lost on the Yorkton (the cargo owners) (plaintiffs) brought suit against Paterson in United States federal court. The cargo owners brought their cases in the United States because under Canadian law Paterson would only be responsible for half of the loss, but under United States law the cargo owners could recover their entire damages wholly from Paterson if the salvage value of the Yorkton was insufficient to cover half of the loss. Paterson moved to have the district court decline jurisdiction because all of the parties and vessels were Canadian. The cargo owners alleged that the district court was obligated to grant jurisdiction because the accident had occurred in United States waters. The district court granted Paterson’s motion and declined jurisdiction. The court of appeals affirmed the decision. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Brandeis, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.