Canali v. Satre
Court of Appeals of Illinois
688 N.E. 2d (1997)
William and Ida Shultz owned a property that they split into five parcels, Parcels A – E, near Plank Road. At the time the Shultzes owned both Parcels D and E, the only access to Plank Road for both parcels was through Parcel D’s driveway. Then, in 1936, the Shultzes sold Parcel D, and Parcel E became landlocked. In 1941, the Schultzes sold Parcel E. Charles Canali (plaintiff) now owns Parcel E. The Satres (defendants) now own Parcel D. Canali sued the Satres, asserting that he had acquired an implied easement of necessity to the driveway located on Parcel D. The Satres argued that Canali failed to satisfy all the requirements to show an implied easement of necessity because the easement had been dormant for years. The Satres also argued that the statute of limitations barred Canali’s claims. The trial court found for the Satres. Canali appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Inglis, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 176,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.