Candelaria v. General Electric Company
New Mexico Court of Appeals
730 P.2d 470, 105 N.M. 167 (1986)
- Written by Serena Lipski, JD
Facts
Robert Lee Candelaria (plaintiff) worked for General Electric Company (GE) (defendant). Before GE, Candelaria was honorably discharged from the military, where he had no problems. Next, Candelaria worked his way up at a company from a plater to foreman to plant manager. The company closed, and Candelaria worked for other employers without issue. At GE, Candeleria began as a janitor, then a forklift operator, and then in a position involving preparing parts for plating. Candelaria worked for different supervisors at GE without issue until he began working for Jewett. Jewett had a reputation as a difficult supervisor, and Candelaria struggled working for Jewett. After another employee quit, Jewett assigned Candelaria that employee’s job duties while still expecting Candelaria to keep up the timing of his previous job duties. Despite Candelaria’s many requests to Jewett and other plant management, no employee was assigned to help Candelaria. One day, as Jewett stood over Candelaria giving him orders, Candelaria began shaking and felt as if he were going to kill Jewett. Candelaria did not attack Jewett but was hospitalized repeatedly for psychological problems. Between hospitalizations, Candelaria returned to work, and Jewett continued to pressure Candelaria, triggering more flare-ups in Candelaria’s condition. Candelaria eventually had a nervous breakdown and was hospitalized again. Candelaria filed a claim for workers’-compensation benefits. Candelaria’s doctor testified that Candelaria did not have any condition that would cause him to misperceive reality. The trial court held that Candelaria’s injury arose out of and occurred in the course of his employment due to actual job stress. GE appealed, arguing that Candelaria did not suffer an accidental injury because it was a gradual psychological injury. GE also argued that Candelaria did not suffer from actual job stress but rather that his condition caused him to distort reality.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Alarid, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.