Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
C

Cannon v. U.S. Acoustics Corp.

398 F. Supp. 209 (1975), aff'd in part, 532 F.2d 1178 (1976)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Cannon v. U.S. Acoustics Corp.

United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
398 F. Supp. 209 (1975), aff'd in part, 532 F.2d 1178 (1976)

Facts

A group of shareholders (plaintiffs) filed a derivative suit on behalf of U.S. Acoustics Corporation and National Perlite Products, S.A. (collectively, the corporations) against four officer-directors of both corporations (defendants). The shareholders alleged that from 1968 to the present, the four officer-directors violated Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5 in regard to illegal stock options that were issued and purchased. Following the filing of the suit, the same law firm entered appearances for the corporations and for the four officer-directors of the corporations. The shareholders filed a motion to strike the appearance of the lawyers of behalf of the corporations. The shareholders argued that the firm could not represent both the corporations and the four officer-directors, because the corporations would benefit if the suit were successful, but the officer-directors would be liable to the corporations and shareholders. The law firm, along with the officer-directors and the corporations, argued that there was no conflict, that the transactions in question were legal, and that the corporations were not truly involved in the lawsuit, but if a conflict should arise, the firm would withdraw its appearance for the officer-directors.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Marshall, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Business Associations

Key Terms