Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Canterbury v. Spence

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
464 F.2d 772 (1972)


Facts

At the age of 19, Canterbury (plaintiff) experienced severe upper back pain and was examined by Dr. Spence (defendant), a neurosurgeon. After undergoing a diagnostic procedure to determine the cause of the pain, Spence recommended that Canterbury undergo a laminectomy, an operation to repair a suspected ruptured disc. Canterbury did not object to nor did he ask any questions about the procedure. Spence spoke to Canterbury’s mother by telephone and informed her that she did not need to come to the hospital and the operation was no more serious “than any other operation.” Canterbury’s mother signed a consent form after the procedure was performed. Post-operation, Canterbury began recuperating normally until he fell from his hospital bed while attempting to use the restroom. Thereafter, Canterbury became paralyzed from the waist down requiring additional surgery. After a second operation, Canterbury regained some limited control over his muscles, but suffered long-term incontinence and bladder paralysis. Canterbury brought a medical malpractice action against Spence and the hospital in federal district court. Spence and the hospital moved for directed verdicts, which the court granted on the basis that Canterbury had failed to produce any medical evidence of negligence. Canterbury appealed to the court of appeals.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Robinson, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.