Capili v. The Finish Line, Inc.

116 F.Supp.3d 1000 (2015)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Capili v. The Finish Line, Inc.

United States District Court for the Northern District of California
116 F.Supp.3d 1000 (2015)

JL
Play video

Facts

Ritarose Capili (plaintiff) was employed by The Finish Line Inc. (defendant) in 2013 and 2014 as a retail employee in California. Capili had to agree to an arbitration agreement in order to apply to work for Finish Line, and Capili had to sign an arbitration agreement as part of her paperwork before starting to work for Finish Line. Agreeing to the arbitration agreement was a condition to being employed by Finish Line. The arbitration agreement required all claims likely to be asserted by an employee to be submitted to arbitration, including wage and hour claims, discrimination claims, and other allegations of violations of federal and state law. However, claims likely to be asserted by Finish Line, including claims for injunctive relief related to unfair competition or disclosure of confidential information, could be brought in court. The arbitration agreement also required all claims to be filed in Indiana and required the employee to pay for half of the cost of the arbitration. Capili sued Finish Line in federal court, alleging that Finish Line terminated Capili because of her pregnancy and other medical conditions. Finish Line filed a motion requesting that Capili be compelled to arbitrate these claims.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Gilliam, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership