Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Capital Group Companies, Inc. v. Armour

Delaware Court of Chancery
2005 WL 678564 (2005)


Facts

Capital Group Companies, Inc. (CGC) (plaintiff) was a privately-held Delaware corporation. Timothy Armour (defendant) was an executive vice president of a CGC subsidiary and purchased CGC stock as an employee. To purchase the shares, Armour was required to enter into a Stock Restriction Agreement (SRA). The SRA prohibited transferring either direct ownership or any interest in the CGC shares to nonemployees. For tax-planning purposes, Armour and his wife, Nina Ritter (defendant), created a revocable trust to purchase additional stock. The trust’s provisions required that CGC approve any distributions of the trust’s CGC shares. The trust also said that the shares could be repurchased by CGC if the shares were distributed to someone other than Armour upon the revocation of the trust. Finally, Armour and Ritter signed a joinder agreement, agreeing to be bound by the SRA. Subsequently, Armour filed for divorce. As part of the divorce, Ritter indicated that she was seeking: (1) an award of a direct or indirect interest in the trust, (2) one-half of any dividends received from the CGC shares and (3) one-half of any proceeds received from the sale of any CGC shares. After being made aware of Ritter’s requests, CGC sued Ritter and Armour seeking a declaration that the SRA prohibited any award of a beneficial or direct interest in the CGC shares to Ritter.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Lamb, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 178,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.