Capitol Records, Inc. v. Thomas-Rasset
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
692 F.3d 899 (2012)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
Jammie Thomas-Rasset (defendant) downloaded and distributed 24 copyrighted songs using file-sharing platforms. Capitol Records, Inc., and other companies holding the songs’ copyrights (plaintiffs) sued for injunctive relief and statutory damages under the Copyright Act. The first jury awarded the companies $222,000, but the trial court ordered a new trial due to a faulty jury instruction. The second jury awarded $1,920,000, but the court remitted it to $54,000, and the companies opted for a new trial instead of accepting remittitur. The third jury awarded $1,500,000, but the court ruled that the maximum amount constitutional due process allowed was $54,000, and again reduced the award to $54,000. The companies appealed, seeking only the $222,000 awarded in the first trial as a tactical strategy and an injunction against making copyrighted works available to the public. Thomas-Rasset cross-appealed, arguing that any award of statutory damages was unconstitutional.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Colloton, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
