Caporicci Footwear v. Federal Express Corp.
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
894 F. Supp. 258 (1995)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Caporicci Footwear, Ltd. (Caporicci) (plaintiff) hired Federal Express Corporation (FedEx) (defendant) to ship shoes from Virginia to Florida and to collect the approximately $98,000 payment from the recipient upon delivery. Caporicci told FedEx that the recipient was International Shoe Company and provided an address, which turned out to be for a self-storage facility. At the facility, a man identified himself as a representative of the International Shoe Company and told the FedEx driver to unload the shoes by the door of a particular storage bay. The man then gave the FedEx driver two seemingly valid cashier’s checks totaling approximately $98,000. However, the checks were found to be fraudulent and worthless. Caporicci sued FedEx, claiming that FedEx (1) breached its contractual obligations by not going to the storage facility’s office to ensure that the address was correct and (2) committed the tort of negligence by delivering the packages outside a storage bay, which caused Caporicci’s packages to be stolen. FedEx moved for summary judgment, arguing that it was not liable because its combined airbill-service guide contract (1) put the entire risk of fraud on Caporicci, (2) specifically stated that FedEx was not acting as Caporicci’s agent while collecting any payment during a delivery, and (3) allowed FedEx to deliver to an alternate location if instructed by the recipient to do so.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hilton, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 781,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.