Carafas v. LaVallee
United States Supreme Court
391 U.S. 234 (1968)
- Written by Arlyn Katen, JD
Facts
James Carafas (defendant) was sentenced to a total of three to five years of incarceration in 1960 for burglary and larceny offenses. New York state courts affirmed Carafas’s conviction on direct appeal, and the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari. In 1963, Carafas applied for a writ of habeas corpus in federal district court while he was still in custody. Carafas was released on parole in 1964, and he completed his sentence and was discharged from parole on March 6, 1967. During that timeframe, the district court dismissed Carafas’s petition on its merits and the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the dismissal. The United States Supreme Court issued a writ of certiorari on October 16, 1967, to consider whether the Second Circuit erred by refusing to allow Carafas to appeal in forma pauperis and waive his legal fees. The state argued that the Supreme Court could not reach that issue because Carafas’s appeal became moot when Carafas was unconditionally released from custody (i.e., when his paroled ended).
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Fortas, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.