Carchman v. Nash
United States Supreme Court
473 U.S. 716 (1985)
In 1976, Richard Nash (respondent) pled guilty in New Jersey to charges of breaking and entering with intent to rape and assault with intent to rape and was sentenced to serve 18 months in prison on each count, to run consecutively for a total of three years. The court suspended two years of the Nash’s sentence and imposed a two-year term of probation to follow his confinement. While on probation, Nash was arrested in Pennsylvania and charged with burglary, involuntary deviate sexual intercourse, and loitering. Nash was tried, convicted, and sentenced to a term of imprisonment in Pennsylvania. While awaiting trial, the probation office in New Jersey contacted the Pennsylvania court and informed it that Nash had violated his probation by committing crimes in Pennsylvania. The probation office requested that a bench warrant be issued for Nash and a detainer lodged against him so that he could be returned to New Jersey after he completed his sentence in Pennsylvania. Shortly thereafter, Nash sent a series of letters to New Jersey officials requesting final disposition of the probation-violation charge and New Jersey failed to bring Nash to “trial” within 180 days as required by the Interstate Agreement on Detainers. Nearly four years later, the Pennsylvania court granted Nash’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, vacated his probation revocation and released him from custody. Carchman (petitioner), the prosecutor in New Jersey, appealed the decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. The appellate court affirmed the Pennsylvania state court’s decision. The U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari to review.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Blackmun, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.