Cardinal Chemical Co. v. Morton International, Inc.

508 U.S. 83 (1993)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
C
From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Cardinal Chemical Co. v. Morton International, Inc.

United States Supreme Court
508 U.S. 83 (1993)

JL
Play video

Facts

Morton International, Inc. (Morton) (plaintiff) owned two patents on chemical compounds. Morton sued Cardinal Chemical Co. (Cardinal) (defendant) and its affiliates in federal court in South Carolina for infringing on those patents. Cardinal denied infringing on the patents and filed a counterclaim for a declaratory judgment that the patents were invalid. Prior to trial, Morton filed two other lawsuits, one in Louisiana and one in Delaware, against other alleged infringers of the same patents. Both of those defendants also filed counterclaims for declaratory judgments on the validity of the patents. The Louisiana case was the first to be tried and resulted in a judgment for the defendant finding no infringement and declaring the patents invalid. On appeal, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the finding of no infringement but vacated the judgment of invalidity without deciding the merits. In this case, the South Carolina trial court also found no infringement and declared the patents to be invalid. Again, on appeal, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the finding of no infringement and vacated the declaratory judgment. Cardinal then petitioned the United States Supreme Court for review.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Stevens, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 782,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 782,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 782,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Remedies

Key Terms