Cargill, Inc. v. Stafford

553 F.2d 1222 (1977)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Cargill, Inc. v. Stafford

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
553 F.2d 1222 (1977)

RW

Facts

On July 31, 1973, Cargill, Inc. (plaintiff) sent Van Stafford (defendant) a contract accepting Stafford’s offer to sell Cargill wheat. The contract set September 30, 1973, as its performance date. On August 21, 1973, Stafford repudiated the contract because he objected to Cargill’s insertion of a right-of-cancellation clause. Cargill received the letter on August 24, 1973. Cargill urged Stafford to perform and took no steps to buy wheat from another source. On September 6, 1973, Stafford told Cargill he would not deliver wheat on September 30, at which point Cargill notified Stafford that it was cancelling the contract and filing a federal diversity suit for anticipatory repudiation. The district court ruled against Stafford and awarded damages based on the September 6 price. Both parties appealed to the Tenth Circuit. The court agreed that Stafford breached the contract. The remaining issue was which date to use for measuring Cargill’s damages.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Breitenstein, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership