Cargill, Inc. v. Stafford
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
553 F.2d 1222 (1977)

- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
On July 31, 1973, Cargill, Inc. (plaintiff) sent Van Stafford (defendant) a contract accepting Stafford’s offer to sell Cargill wheat. The contract set September 30, 1973, as its performance date. On August 21, 1973, Stafford repudiated the contract because he objected to Cargill’s insertion of a right-of-cancellation clause. Cargill received the letter on August 24, 1973. Cargill urged Stafford to perform and took no steps to buy wheat from another source. On September 6, 1973, Stafford told Cargill he would not deliver wheat on September 30, at which point Cargill notified Stafford that it was cancelling the contract and filing a federal diversity suit for anticipatory repudiation. The district court ruled against Stafford and awarded damages based on the September 6 price. Both parties appealed to the Tenth Circuit. The court agreed that Stafford breached the contract. The remaining issue was which date to use for measuring Cargill’s damages.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Breitenstein, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.