Carl Borchsenius Co. v. Gardner
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
282 F. Supp. 396 (1968)

- Written by Alex Ruskell, JD
Facts
Carl Borchsenius Co. (plaintiff) imported a large shipment of coffee from Brazil. The Food and Drug Administration allowed about half of the shipment into the United States, but the remaining coffee was rejected after an examination discovered that some of the coffee was moldy and damp. Carl requested and received permission to attempt to bring the damaged part of the shipment into compliance by removing the moldy beans and drying the coffee. After doing so, about half of the remaining shipment received approval, but the remainder was again rejected. The FDA told Carl it would release the recovered coffee as soon as Carl destroyed the remainder. Carl asked whether it could export the rejected coffee instead. The FDA refused to release the recovered coffee until the remaining rejected coffee was destroyed. Carl sued, arguing that the FDA did not have the authority to order the remaining coffee’s destruction without giving Carl a chance to export it. The FDA responded that although the entire shipment could have been exported after rejection, the fact that Carl attempted to bring part of the shipment into compliance took away the export option.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cassibry, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.