Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. Case Brief

Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co.

Court of Appeal
[1893] 1 Q.B. 256

Facts

The owners of Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. (Carbolic) (defendants) manufactured the Carbolic Smoke Ball and advertised it as a preventative measure against influenza. Carbolic placed an advertisement in several London newspapers saying that one hundred pounds would be paid to any person who purchased a Carbolic Smoke Ball and still contracted influenza. The advertisement further stated that Carbolic had deposited one thousand pounds in a local bank to demonstrate its seriousness in the matter. Carlill (plaintiff) purchased a Carbolic Smoke Ball and later contracted influenza despite using the ball as directed by Carbolic’s instructions. Carlill brought suit to recover the one hundred pounds. The trial court held she was entitled to the one hundred pounds, and Carbolic appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Lindley, L.J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Here's why 90,000 law students rely on our case briefs:

Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners not other law students.
The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet.
12,195 briefs - keyed to 164 casebooks.
Uniform format for every case brief.
Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language.
Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions.
Ability to tag case briefs in an outlining tool.
Top-notch customer support.