Carlson v. Bear, Stearns & Company, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
906 F.2d 315 (1990)
Facts
Certain Illinois-based purchasers of stock (purchasers) (plaintiffs) brought suit against their broker and its salesperson, seeking to rescind the purchases on the ground that the sellers were not registered dealers and salespersons in Illinois and that the securities were not registered pursuant to the Illinois Securities Act (Illinois act). The purchasers also sued Bear, Stearns, & Company, Inc. (Bear) (defendant), the broker that cleared the transactions. As the clearing broker, Bear received a flat fee per transaction for performing ministerial tasks, such as preparing and maintaining transaction records; receiving payment; and transmitting stock certificates, confirmations, and statements. The purchasers asserted that Bear was jointly and severally liable under the Illinois act because it (1) “participated or aided in any way” the improper sales or (2) was a party “by or on behalf of whom said sale was made.” The district court rescinded the transactions, ordering the broker and salesman to pay damages and attorney’s fees of almost $300,000. However, the district court ruled that Bear was not jointly and severally liable under the act. The purchasers appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bauer, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 711,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
