Carman v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
114 F.3d 790 (1997)
- Written by Miller Jozwiak, JD
Facts
The McDonnell Douglas Aircraft Corporation (McDonnell Douglas) (defendant) employed Frank Carman (plaintiff) before laying him off in 1992. Carman responded by suing McDonnell Douglas for various employment-discrimination claims. During discovery, Carman sought various documents from McDonnell Douglas’s corporate ombudsman, Therese Clemente. Corporate ombudsman referred to an employee who was outside the corporate chain of command and investigated workplace disputes. McDonnell Douglas objected to the request. The district court concluded that the documents were protected by the ombudsman privilege and denied the request. The court later granted McDonnell Douglas’s motion for summary judgment, and Carman appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Arnold, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
