Carmichele v. Ministers of Safety and Security and of Justice and Constitutional Development
South Africa Constitutional Court
94 SALR 938 (CC) (South Africa) (2001)
- Written by Mary Katherine Cunningham, JD
Facts
In August 1995, Francois Coetzee attacked and injured Alix Carmichele (plaintiff) near Knysna. The Knysna regional court convicted Coetzee of attempted murder and housebreaking and sentenced him to a prison term of 12.5 years. Carmichele filed a delict action against the minister for safety and security and the minister of justice and constitutional development (the ministers) (defendants). Carmichele asserted that Coetzee had committed two prior acts of sexual assault and that Coetzee brutally beat another woman, E, prior to August 1995. Carmichele asserted that the investigating officer for these incidents sent a note to the prosecutor indicating there was no reason to deny Coetzee bail and that the prosecutor did not provide any information about Coetzee’s prior convictions. After Coetzee was granted bail for these three prior incidents, Coetzee attempted to attack E and her friends again. However, the police and the prosecutors failed to mention these incidents when Coetzee reappeared for a bail hearing. Coetzee then attacked Carmichele while out on bail in August 1995. Carmichele argued that the South African police service and public prosecutors who served under the ministers failed to prevent Coetzee from causing her harm, thereby breaching a legal duty owed to her. In the midst of the trial on Carmichele’s suit, the South Africa Constitutional Court heard the constitutional questions in the matter.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Ackermann, Goldstone, JJ.)
What to do next…
Here's why 782,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.