Logourl black
From our private database of 14,200+ case briefs...

Carolan v. Bell

Maine Supreme Judicial Court
916 A.2d 945 (2007)

Facts

Carolan (defendant) and Bell (plaintiff) had a seven-year-old son together. Carolan was a dental assistant and earned $13.50 per hour working Monday through Thursday. Carolan's employer covered her health-insurance costs, and Carolan rented a small home that was owned by her parents for $1,000 per month. Carolan’s parents previously rented the home for $1,300. Carolan and Bell were granted joint parental rights and responsibilities. Carolan also sought a child-support order and brought a claim against Bell. Bell argued that the district court should impute additional income to Carolan in calculating Carolan’s gross income. Bell suggested that income should be imputed for the value of Carolan's health insurance that her employer paid for, the difference between Carolan's rent and the rent her parents charged the prior tenant, and voluntary underemployment. The district court agreed and adopted Bill's suggestions for imputing income to Carolan in its child-support order. Carolan appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Alexander, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 251,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Here's why 251,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners not other law students.
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet.
  • 14,200 briefs - keyed to 189 casebooks.
  • Uniform format for every case brief.
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language.
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions.
  • Ability to tag case briefs in an outlining tool.
  • Top-notch customer support.