Carolan v. Bell
Maine Supreme Judicial Court
916 A.2d 945 (2007)
- Written by Brittany Frankel, JD
Facts
Carolan (defendant) and Bell (plaintiff) had a seven-year-old son together. Carolan was a dental assistant and earned $13.50 per hour working Monday through Thursday. Carolan's employer covered her health-insurance costs, and Carolan rented a small home that was owned by her parents for $1,000 per month. Carolan’s parents previously rented the home for $1,300. Carolan and Bell were granted joint parental rights and responsibilities. Carolan also sought a child-support order and brought a claim against Bell. Bell argued that the district court should impute additional income to Carolan in calculating Carolan’s gross income. Bell suggested that income should be imputed for the value of Carolan's health insurance that her employer paid for, the difference between Carolan's rent and the rent her parents charged the prior tenant, and voluntary underemployment. The district court agreed and adopted Bill's suggestions for imputing income to Carolan in its child-support order. Carolan appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Alexander, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
