Carpenter v. Ruperto

315 N.W.2d 782 (1982)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Carpenter v. Ruperto

Supreme Court of Iowa
315 N.W.2d 782 (1982)

Play video

Facts

Virginia Carpenter (plaintiff) moved into her home in Des Moines, Iowa, in 1951. The property on which the home was situated bordered an empty lot. At first, the empty lot was partially a cornfield, and then used for storing debris. Shortly after moving in, Ms. Carpenter cleared out a portion of the adjacent lot, knowing the land belonged to another, out of concern that the lot would attract rodents. Over the years, Ms. Carpenter used the adjacent lot to plant bushes, and eventually stored a propane tank and extended her driveway onto it. In 1978, a group of investors purchased the adjacent lot (Ruperto) (defendants). Ruperto, aware that Ms. Carpenter had been using a portion of the lot, attempted to settle any dispute regarding her use of the land. This failed, and Ms. Carpenter brought an action to quiet Ruperto’s title on the lot through adverse possession. The trial court determined that Ms. Carpenter did not obtain the adjacent lot through adverse possession under a claim of right, as Ms. Carpenter did not use good faith in using the adjacent lot because she knew its title belonged to someone else. Ms. Carpenter appealed and eventually petitioned for certiorari to the Supreme Court of Iowa.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (McCormick, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 747,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 747,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 747,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership