Carr v. Deking
Court of Appeals of Washington
765 P.2d 40 (1988)
Joel Carr (plaintiff) and his father, George Carr, owned land together as tenants in common. They leased the land to Richard Deking (defendant) from 1974 to 1986. The Carrs paid for one-third of the fertilizer crops and received one-third of the annual crop as rent. This arrangement was pursuant to a year-to-year oral agreement between the Carrs and Deking. In 1986, Joel indicated to Deking that he wished to receive rent in cash beginning the next year. Deking did not respond. Instead, Deking entered into a ten-year crop-share lease agreement with George in 1987, without Joel’s knowledge or approval. Under this agreement, Deking was to pay all fertilizer costs. In April 1987, Joel attempted to eject Deking from the land. When Deking refused, Joel brought suit, seeking a declaration that the lease between George and Deking was invalid. Both parties moved for summary judgment. The trial court ruled in favor of Deking, finding that the lease between George and Deking was valid. Before judgment, Joel sought a one-third share of the crop if he acquiesced in the lease. The trial court ruled that Joel was only entitled to one-sixth of the crop and was required to reimburse Deking for one-sixth of the fertilizer costs.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Green, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 725,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 725,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,700 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.