From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.
Carr v. Radkey
Texas Supreme Court
393 S.W.2d 806 (1965)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
Radkey and others (plaintiffs) contested Hattie Hewlett's will, arguing Hewlett was of unsound mind and therefore lacked capacity to execute a will. At trial, the State of Texas, represented by Carr (defendant), proffered a mental health expert's opinion that some of Hewlett's actions showed that she was of sound mind at the time she executed the will. The judge excluded the proffered testimony because it pertained to the ultimate issue in the case, thus invading the province of the jury. The jury determined Hewlett was mentally incapacitated, and the trial court denied probate to the will. The appeals court affirmed the judgment, and the state appealed to the Supreme Court of Texas.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Greenhill, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
