Carradine v. Barnhart
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
360 F.3d 751 (2004)
- Written by Samantha Arena, JD
Facts
Patty Caradine (plaintiff) injured her back, seeking treatment from a number of doctors in the ensuing years. Carradine was diagnosed with various ailments, including scoliosis, depression, and psychosomatic illness, defined as physical distress with a psychological origin. Carradine was treated with strong drugs and underwent spine surgery to address her pain. Carradine applied to the Social Security Administration (SSA) for disability benefits. The application was denied. Upon review, an administrative-law judge (ALJ) acknowledged that Carradine had a severe impairment but affirmed the denial because the ALJ disbelieved Carradine’s testimony regarding the severity of her pain. The ALJ concluded that (1) due to her psychosomatic illness, Carradine was more likely to exaggerate her level of pain and symptoms; (2) Carradine’s treating doctors were unable to find objective evidence to support Carradine’s contentions but accepted her complaints at face value and continued treatment despite this fact; and (3) Carradine’s testimony was inconsistent with the activities she performed, including household chores and two-mile walks. Carradine appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Posner, J.)
Dissent (Coffey, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.