Carradine v. Barnhart

360 F.3d 751 (2004)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Carradine v. Barnhart

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
360 F.3d 751 (2004)

Facts

Patty Caradine (plaintiff) injured her back, seeking treatment from a number of doctors in the ensuing years. Carradine was diagnosed with various ailments, including scoliosis, depression, and psychosomatic illness, defined as physical distress with a psychological origin. Carradine was treated with strong drugs and underwent spine surgery to address her pain. Carradine applied to the Social Security Administration (SSA) for disability benefits. The application was denied. Upon review, an administrative-law judge (ALJ) acknowledged that Carradine had a severe impairment but affirmed the denial because the ALJ disbelieved Carradine’s testimony regarding the severity of her pain. The ALJ concluded that (1) due to her psychosomatic illness, Carradine was more likely to exaggerate her level of pain and symptoms; (2) Carradine’s treating doctors were unable to find objective evidence to support Carradine’s contentions but accepted her complaints at face value and continued treatment despite this fact; and (3) Carradine’s testimony was inconsistent with the activities she performed, including household chores and two-mile walks. Carradine appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Posner, J.)

Dissent (Coffey, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership