Logourl black
From our private database of 13,800+ case briefs...

Carrig v. Gilbert-Varker Corp.

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
50 N.E.2d 59 (1943)


Facts

On May 2, 1941, James A. Carrig (plaintiff) hired Gilbert-Varker Corporation (Gilbert-Varker) (defendant) to construct thirty-five houses. A written contract included a schedule that set forth the price apportioned to each house. The contract provided that Carrig would take out separate mortgages on each lot and transfer the proceeds of each mortgage to Gilbert-Varker. Gilbert-Varker was to commence construction on each house once it received the proceeds of each mortgage. Gilbert-Varker would be paid for each house as certain stages of construction were reached. Final payments were to be paid to Gilbert-Varker upon completion of each house. Gilbert-Varker ultimately completed twenty houses but refused to construct the remaining fifteen houses. Carrig brought suit to recover for Gilbert-Varker’s breach, based upon Gilbert-Varker’s refusal to build the final fifteen houses and for allegedly failing to build the twenty houses in accordance with the contract’s plans and specifications. An auditor determined that Carrig was not entitled to recover for the construction of the twenty houses, but was entitled to $9,935.00 for Gilbert-Varker’s refusal to build fifteen houses. Accordingly, judgment was granted to Carrig for $9,935.00. Gilbert-Varker brought a cross-action to recover amounts due for its construction of the twenty houses. The auditor found that Carrig owed Gilbert-Varker $2,816.35 in unpaid fees for the twenty houses, but that Gilbert-Varker was not entitled to recover this amount due to its refusal to build the last fifteen houses.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Ronan, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 170,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.