Carrington v. Rash

380 U.S. 89 (1965)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Carrington v. Rash

United States Supreme Court
380 U.S. 89 (1965)

  • Written by Galina Abdel Aziz , JD

Facts

Carrington (plaintiff) was a sergeant in the United States Army. He enlisted from Alabama in 1946, at the age of eighteen. In 1962, Carrington moved to Texas which he intended to make his home permanently. Carrington owned a home, a small business, and a car in Texas. Carrington paid property taxes and his car was registered in Texas. Carrington commuted to his military post in White Sands, New Mexico. Texas amended its constitution to prohibit any military personnel who relocate to Texas from voting in state elections so long as their service was active. Carrington sued for violation of the Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection Clause. Texas argued that it had legitimate interests in preventing the concentrated balloting of military personnel as to not overwhelm the local community and protect the franchise from infiltration by transients. The Texas Supreme Court agreed, and Carrington appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Stewart, J.)

Dissent (Harlan, J)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership