Carroll v. President and Commissioners of Princess Anne
United States Supreme Court
393 U.S. 175, 89 S.Ct. 347, 21 L.Ed.2d 325 (1968)
- Written by Josh Lee, JD
Facts
The defendants were identified with the National States Rights Party, a white supremacist organization. The defendants held a public assembly in the evening of August 6, 1966, near the courthouse steps in the town of Princess Anne, which is the county seat of Somerset County. This rally involved speech that could be construed as provocative to blacks in attendance and as inciting to whites at the rally. During the rally, the defendants announced that another event would be held the following night. On August 7, 1966, officials of Princess Anne and Somerset County petitioned the Circuit Court for Somerset County for a restraining order prohibiting that evening’s rally from occurring. The trial court held an ex parte hearing and entered a restraining order prohibiting the defendants from holding meetings or rallies tending to disturb and endanger the citizens of the County for a period of ten days. No notice was given to the defendants, and no efforts were made to informally communicate with the defendants prior to the hearing. Some of the defendants were served with the writ of injunction at 6:10 p.m. that evening. A full trial was conducted ten days later, and the trial court extended the injunction for ten months. The defendants appealed to the Maryland Court of Appeals, which reversed the ten-month injunction, but upheld the ten-day restraining order. The defendants then petitioned the United States Supreme Court for review.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Fortas, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.