Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 16,500+ case briefs...

Carter v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court
40 T.C.M. 654 (1980)


Facts

Toward the end of 1974, Robert Carter (plaintiff) took a job for the City of New York. Payroll issues made the city unable to promptly pay Carter. On January 3, 1975, the city paid Carter for four weeks of services rendered in 1974. Carter had been unemployed for most of 1974, and if he had received the four weeks’ pay in 1974, he would have owed no additional taxes. Carter, a cash-basis taxpayer, reported the four weeks’ income on his 1974 tax return. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (defendant) assessed a deficiency against Carter, determining that the income should have been reported on his 1975 return. Carter appealed, arguing that he constructively received the income in 1974.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Wilbur, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 419,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 16,500 briefs, keyed to 223 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers


Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial