Carter v. Commonwealth
Virginia Court of Appeals
594 S.E.2d 284, 42 Va. App. 681 (2004)
- Written by Caroline Milne, JD
Facts
Officer B.N. O’Donnell pulled over a speeding car around 11:00 p.m. and conducted a routine traffic stop. While Officer O’Donnell was speaking with the driver of the car, O’Donnell used his flashlight to conduct a plain-view search of the car to confirm there were no weapons or drugs inside. As O’Donnell was doing so, he noticed that Carter (defendant), who was seated in the front passenger seat, had his right hand out of sight. Carter then drew his hand up and pointed his index finger straight out and his thumb straight up. Carter pointed at O’Donnell and said “pow.” O’Donnell believed Carter had a weapon and went for his own service revolver, but O’Donnell quickly realized Carter was only using his finger as if it were a gun. O’Donnell later testified that it was a terrifying exchange and that he would have shot Carter if O’Donnell had been successful in accessing his service revolver. Carter was convicted of assault of a law-enforcement officer. Carter appealed, arguing that his actions did not constitute assault, because Carter did not have the present ability to harm Officer O’Donnell at the time Carter cocked his finger at him.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Clements, J.)
Dissent (Benton, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.