Carter v. Hewitt
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
617 F.2d 961 (1980)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Reginald Carter (plaintiff) was an inmate at a state prison. Carter filed suit against various prison officials (defendants), alleging that he had been severely beaten by guards at the prison. The defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. Carter testified at a hearing on the motion. During their cross-examination of Carter, the defendants presented a letter written by Carter to another inmate. The letter stated, “This is a set up.” The letter also encouraged the other inmate to file complaints against prison officials to establish a false pattern of “barbaric brutal” harassment. The hearing magistrate directed Carter to read the letter aloud, and later admitted the letter into evidence. The district court ruled in favor of the defendants. Carter appealed, arguing that the letter should have been excluded under Federal Rule of Evidence (FRE) 403 for unfair prejudice.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Garth, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.