Carter v. Kinney
Supreme Court of Missouri
896 S.W.2d 926 (1995)
- Written by Mary Pfotenhauer, JD
Facts
Carter (plaintiff) fell and was injured on a patch of ice in the driveway of Ronald and Mary Kinney (defendants). Carter was present on the Kinneys’ property to attend a bible study they were hosting at their home. Participants in the bible study were church members who had signed up on a sheet at church. There was no general invitation to the public to attend the bible study. The Kinneys did not receive money for hosting the bible study. The Kinneys had removed snow from their driveway the previous day, but were unaware ice had formed during the night. The Kinneys argue that in this case Carter was a licensee, and that they owed no duty to him to remove unknown dangers. Carter argues that he is an invitee, and the Kinneys owed him a duty of care to protect him against unknown but discoverable dangerous conditions. The trial court dismissed the Kinneys on summary judgment, finding that the Kinneys had no duty to Carter, as a licensee.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Robertson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 779,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.