Logourl black
From our private database of 13,800+ case briefs...

Carter v. United States

United States Supreme Court
530 U.S. 255 (2000)


Facts

In 1997, Carter (defendant) ran into a bank in New Jersey, jumped behind the customer service desks, and stole $16,000 from the different cash drawers.  Carter was charged with federal bank robbery under section 2113, subsection (a) of the United States Code, which required a taking by force or intimidation. Carter claimed that he did not take the money by force or intimidation as required by the subsection of the statute under which he was charged, and before the trial in the district court, asked that the jury be instructed on a “lesser included offense.” The “lesser included offense” was subsection (b) of section 2113, or federal bank larceny. The district court denied Carter’s motion, and Carter was convicted of federal bank robbery. The jury was only instructed to consider whether Carter had violated subsection (a). Carter appealed, claiming that the jury should have been instructed to consider subsection (b) of the statute as well because it was a “lesser included offense.” The court of appeals affirmed the district court’s ruling. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Thomas, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Dissent (Ginsburg, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 171,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.