Cartier International B.V. v. Ben-Menachem
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
2008 WL 64005 (2008)
- Written by Ann Wooster, JD
Facts
Cartier International B.V. (Cartier) (plaintiff) was a fashion manufacturer and distributor with an international reputation for high-quality luxury goods. Cartier used its federally registered trademarks for a collection of watches sold throughout the world. Cartier’s representatives investigated reports of counterfeiting and discovered that a company called Ben-Menachem (Ben) (defendant) imported, exported, distributed, advertised, offered for sale through various websites, and sold counterfeit watches bearing Cartier’s trademarks. Family members Ilan Ben-Menachem, Aviv Ben-Menachem, David Ben-Menachem, and Chana Ben-Menachem (defendants) operated the websites and counterfeiting entities out of their shared home. The websites displayed photographs of replicas that were designed to look exactly like genuine Cartier watches and bore copies of Cartier’s trademarks. Cartier filed an action in the district court, claiming that Ben counterfeited Cartier’s watches by copying 19 different federally registered trademarks in violation of the Lanham Act. The district court issued a temporary restraining order and a civil-seizure order. Police officers, Cartier’s representatives, and Cartier’s attorneys executed the civil-seizure order at Ben’s office, which was also the residence of Ilan, Aviv, David, and Chana. The district court held an evidentiary hearing and entered a preliminary injunction against Ben’s importing, distributing, advertising, and selling of the counterfeit watches. Cartier filed a motion for summary judgment on its counterfeiting claim.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Sweet, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.