Case of Blake v. Guatemala
Inter-American Court of Human Rights
Inter-Am. Ct. H.R. Ser. C No. 27 (1996)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
In March 1985, American Nicholas Blake disappeared in Guatemala (defendant). Blake’s family (plaintiffs) spent years trying to find him. In 1988, a Guatemalan official told the family that Blake had been killed by government actors in March 1985 and that his body had been burned to hide the crime. In 1992, Blake’s remains were located and identified, and a death certificate was issued confirming he died in 1985. Blake’s family submitted a complaint to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, alleging that Guatemala had violated the American Convention on Human Rights (ACHR). The commission determined that Guatemalan officials had caused Blake’s forced disappearance and death and had tried to cover up the offenses. The commission recommended that Guatemala prosecute and punish the individuals who had committed these acts, but Guatemala did not implement the commission’s recommendations. The commission submitted the matter to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights for further action. However, Guatemala had accepted the court’s jurisdiction only for events occurring in 1987 or later. Because Blake had been killed in 1985, Guatemala objected that the court had no jurisdiction to hear the case. The court considered the objection.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

