Case of First Sergeant Juan Carlos
Spain Supreme Court
Military Chamber (2019)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Army soldier Jose Pablo (plaintiff) was in a unit under the authority of First Sergeant Juan Carlos (defendant). Carlos singled Pablo out for derogatory names and comments, repeatedly ridiculing Pablo in front of the unit. For instance, Carlos referred to making any mistake as “doing a Jose Pablo.” Carlos also ordered Pablo to show him a photo of Pablo’s girlfriend in front of others in the unit and then ridiculed the photo. Carlos also hit Pablo in the chest with a closed fist on several occasions. Two soldiers in the unit, Juliàn and Marco Antonio (defendants), wrote a degrading song about Pablo that mostly contained examples of the ways that Carlos ridiculed Pablo. Pablo filed a complaint alleging that Carlos, Juliàn, and Antonio had committed the crime of abuse of authority by subjecting him to (1) mistreatment and (2) degrading treatment. Carlos, Juliàn, and Antonio moved to dismiss the charges, arguing that even if the factual allegations were true, legally, these facts were not enough to support the military crime of abuse of authority. The local military court found that the alleged facts were sufficient to state the crime of abuse of authority. However, the territorial military court disagreed and dismissed the charges as legally insufficient. The matter was appealed to the Military Chamber of the Spain Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Meca, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.