Case of Husayn (Abu Zubaydah) v. Poland
European Court of Human Rights
Application No. 7511/13 (2014)
- Written by Haley Gintis, JD
Facts
Abu Zubaydah (plaintiff) filed an action in the European Court of Human Rights against Poland (defendant) for violating the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (the convention). Zubaydah claimed that Poland had allowed the United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) to establish a secret prison for high-value detainees, at which American officials tortured terrorist suspects. Zubaydah claimed that he and other high-value detainees were blindfolded and shackled, flown to an airport in Poland, and then transported by vans to the prison site. Zubaydah was later transferred from Poland to a different CIA prison. Zubaydah introduced evidence that Poland and the CIA had entered a bilateral agreement under which Poland was obligated to provide the CIA with physical security to guard the building and agreed to maintain secrecy and not to interfere with the CIA’s activities within the building. Zubaydah’s sources of evidence included reports and comments made by Polish, American, and European Union officials. Additionally, Zubaydah introduced experts who testified that given the statements that had been made by various officials, the complexity of the transportation of the high-value detainees, and the fact that reports began circulating that the CIA was abusing detained terrorists in multiple prison sites, Poland officials knew or should have known of the CIA’s operations and that the detainees were likely to experience torture by the American officials. The court considered the case.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.