Case of Schalk and Kopf v. Austria
European Court of Human Rights
App. No. 30141/04 (2010), reprinted in 49 I.L.M. 1306 (2010)
- Written by Mary Katherine Cunningham, JD
Facts
In 2002, Schalk and Kopf (plaintiffs) sought a marriage license, but Austrian authorities denied the license on the ground that marriage was limited to parties of the opposite sex. In 2010, Austria (defendant) enacted a Registered Partnership Act, providing same-sex couples with formal recognition of their relationships. Although similar to Austrian marriage laws, the Registered Partnership Act contained important differences. Unlike married couples, registered partners could not adopt a child, could not adopt the other partner’s child, and could not use artificial insemination. Schalk and Kopf filed a complaint, arguing the refusal of the Austrian government to allow them to contract to marry violated Article 8, Article 12, and Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). Austria argued the Registered Partnership Act allows same-sex couples to obtain a status similar to marriage, although reserving marriage for different-sex couples.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
Dissent (Rozakis, Spielmann, and Jebens, JJ.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.