Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Caspersen v. Town of Lyme

New Hampshire Supreme Court
661 A.2d 759 (1995)


Facts

The Caspersens (plaintiffs) own about 800 acres of land in the mountain and forest district (District) of the Town of Lyme (defendant). The Caspersens use their property for forestry purposes and have never attempted to develop it. In 1989, the town adopted a comprehensive zoning ordinance (Ordinance) that permits forestry and single-family dwellings within the District for any lot that is 50 acres or larger. The town’s stated objectives for the District include encouraging the continuation of large tracts of land and encouraging forestry and timber harvesting. The Caspersens challenged the Ordinance. The Caspersens argued that the Ordinance would exclude low or moderate-income housing in the District, making the area less diverse. However, the Caspersens admitted that they had no intention of actually constructing any low or moderate-income housing on their property. The town held a rehearing but did not change the Ordinance. The Caspersens appealed to the trial court. The trial court upheld the Ordinance. The Caspersens appealed and argued that the Ordinance’s restriction on lot sizes: (1) was exclusionary, (2) violated their substantive due process and equal protection rights, (3) violated the state’s controlled growth statutes, and (4) was improperly adopted.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Horton, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Concurrence (Brock, J.)

The concurrence section is for members only and includes a summary of the concurring judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.