Cassirer v. Kingdom of Spain
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
616 F.3d 1019 (2010)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
Germany’s Nazi government unlawfully confiscated a valuable painting from its owner in 1939. In 2000, the owner’s grandson, Claude Cassirer (plaintiff), learned that a Spanish foundation lawfully acquired the painting in the 1980s. The foundation was an instrumentality of the Kingdom of Spain (Spain) (defendant). Cassirer filed suit against the Spanish government in a United States federal district court to recover the painting. The court found that the Spanish foundation often featured the painting in its American business advertising. Accordingly, the court rejected Spain’s assertion of sovereign immunity and denied Spain’s motion to dismiss the case. Spain appealed, arguing that Spain played no role in the 1939 confiscation and that the Spanish foundation’s American business dealings were neither significant nor conducted to make a profit. A panel of Ninth Circuit judges affirmed the district court’s ruling. The full court then agreed to hear Spain’s appeal en banc.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Rymer, J.)
Dissent (Gould, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 791,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.