Castillo v. G&M Realty L.P.

950 F.3d 155 (2020)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Castillo v. G&M Realty L.P.

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
950 F.3d 155 (2020)

Play video

Facts

The Visual Artists Rights Act (VARA) gave the creator of a visual artwork the right to prevent destruction of a work “of recognized stature.” A written instrument signed by the creator was necessary to waive the right. If artwork was part of a building and removal of the work was not possible without damaging the work, the creator could waive his rights only by means of a written instrument signed by the creator and the building’s owner. Furthermore, VARA required the building owner to give the creator of the artwork notice and 90 days to remove the artwork if changes to the building threatened the work. VARA authorized courts to award statutory damages of up to $150,000 per artwork if the artwork was damaged willfully. Gerald Wolkoff (defendant), a principal in G&M Realty L.P. (G&M) (defendant), gave artist Jonathan Cohen (plaintiff) and others permission to cover the walls of old warehouses owned by G&M with aerosol art. The warehouses became an internationally known center for aerosol art known as 5Pointz. With Cohen’s permission, some of the artwork at the site was sometimes covered over by new art. In May 2013, G&M sought to demolish the site to build condominiums. Cohen, Maria Castillo, and other artists (collectively, the artists) (plaintiffs) sued under VARA to stop the demolition of the warehouses. The district court granted a temporary restraining order to block the demolition. However, the court denied the artists’ request for a permanent injunction. That night, Wolkoff banned the artists from the site and refused permission to remove artwork that could have been preserved. Several nights later, Wolkoff hired workmen to whitewash the art. The district court found that the art at 5Pointz was of recognized stature and that Wolkoff acted willfully. The court awarded the artists $6.75 million in damages. G&M appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Parker, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership